Case Study: A Comparative Analysis of Incident Energy Calculations using IEEE 1584 2018 versus IEEE 1584 2002

Overview of IEEE 1584 Standards

The IEEE 1584 standard, "Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations," has been an essential tool for electrical engineers since its inception, providing a structured method to calculate incident energy and arc flash boundaries. Understanding and mitigating arc flash hazards is critical for the safety of personnel working on or near electrical equipment. Over the years, the IEEE 1584 standard has undergone significant revisions to incorporate new research findings and technological advancements, with the most notable changes occurring in the 2018 update.

Key Differences between IEEE 1584 2002 and IEEE 1584 2018

1. Electrode Configurations

One of the most substantial changes in the 2018 edition of IEEE 1584 is the expansion of electrode configurations that must be considered during arc flash analysis. The 2002 edition primarily focused on a limited set of configurations, which sometimes resulted in less accurate incident energy calculations. In contrast, the 2018 edition introduces five distinct electrode configurations, adding complexity but significantly improving the accuracy of the analysis. These configurations are:

• Horizontal conductors in open air

• Horizontal conductors in a metal box enclosure

• Vertical conductors in a box that end at an insulating barrier

• Vertical conductors terminated in a metal enclosure

• Vertical conductors in open air

These additional configurations require the engineer to closely examine the equipment's conductor and enclosure arrangement to identify the most representative scenario for the arc flash analysis. The need to consider a broader range of configurations ensures that the calculated incident energy values are more representative of real-world conditions.

2. Equipment Enclosure Dimensions

Another significant enhancement in the 2018 edition is the ability to specify the actual equipment enclosure dimensions. In the 2002 edition, calculations were often based on generic assumptions regarding equipment size, leading to potential inaccuracies. The 2018 edition allows for the input of precise enclosure dimensions, which enhances the accuracy of incident energy calculations. This change is particularly beneficial for facilities with diverse and unique equipment setups, as it accounts for the specific geometry of the equipment involved in the arc flash analysis.

Additionally, the 2018 edition introduces several new typical equipment classes, providing a more comprehensive framework for categorizing and analyzing various types of electrical equipment. This inclusion helps engineers better understand the specific characteristics of different equipment classes, further refining the accuracy of arc flash hazard assessments.

Opening to the Case Study

In this case study, we will apply the methodologies outlined in both IEEE 1584 2002 and IEEE 1584 2018 to calculate the incident energy values for a specific electrical system.

Our focus is on a county hospital that receives 480Y/277V service from an EMC-owned 500 kVA pad-mount transformer. The main switchboard of the hospital powers various critical loads throughout the building, including three automatic transfer switches serving Life Safety, Critical, and Equipment branches. The emergency side of these transfer switches is supplied by a 400 kVA generator.

It is worthy to note that for simplicity, though the model contains multiple scenarios, only incident energy values in the normal operating scenario (utility feeding all electrical gear, generator off, ATS’s in normal position) will be analyzed.

This case study will provide valuable insights into how the advancements in IEEE 1584 2018 can influence arc flash analysis and safety protocols in healthcare facilities, ultimately contributing to enhanced protection for electrical workers and improved operational reliability.

Through this detailed comparison, we will not only illustrate the practical applications of the revised standard but also demonstrate the importance of adopting the latest methodologies to ensure the highest level of safety in electrical engineering practices.

Results and Discussion

The comparative analysis of incident energy values for the county hospital's electrical system using IEEE 1584 2002 and IEEE 1584 2018 standards revealed significant differences. The incident energy values were calculated for various bus locations, and the results are summarized in the following table:

The results indicate significant differences in the calculated incident energy values between the two standards. The IEEE 1584 2018 standard generally yields higher incident energy values for most bus locations, with the largest differences observed at:

• ECLDP: 7.38 cal/cm² (2002) vs. 15.73 cal/cm² (2018), a difference of 8.35 cal/cm².

• EQL1: 4.40 cal/cm² (2002) vs. 11.17 cal/cm² (2018), a difference of 6.77 cal/cm².

• EDP: 6.54 cal/cm² (2002) vs. 13.29 cal/cm² (2018), a difference of 6.75 cal/cm².

Conversely, some locations show a reduction in incident energy values when using the IEEE 1584 2018 standard, such as:

• MSB: 34.56 cal/cm² (2002) vs. 23.56 cal/cm² (2018), a difference of -10.99 cal/cm².

• ECL1A (SECT1 and SECT2): 1.84 and 1.91 cal/cm² (2002) vs. 0.14 cal/cm² (2018), with differences of -1.70 and -1.77 cal/cm² respectively.

These discrepancies highlight the impact of the updated electrode configurations and the consideration of actual equipment enclosure dimensions in the 2018 standard. The increase in calculated incident energy for most locations suggests that the 2018 standard provides a more conservative and potentially safer approach to arc flash hazard assessment. However, the reduction in certain locations also indicates that the new standard can offer more accurate and context-specific evaluations, reducing the likelihood of overestimating hazards in some scenarios.

Conclusion

The comparative analysis of incident energy calculations using IEEE 1584 2002 and IEEE 1584 2018 standards for the county hospital's electrical system underscores the importance of adopting the latest methodologies in arc flash hazard assessment. The 2018 standard's inclusion of additional electrode configurations and the ability to specify precise equipment enclosure dimensions significantly affect the calculated incident energy values, enhancing both accuracy and safety.

The findings from this case study indicate that:

• The IEEE 1584 2018 standard generally produces higher incident energy values, leading to more conservative and safer assessments.

• The updated standard also provides more accurate evaluations for specific equipment setups, preventing overestimation of hazards.

By adopting IEEE 1584 2018, engineers and safety professionals can ensure a higher level of protection for electrical workers, particularly in complex and varied environments like healthcare facilities. The advancements in the 2018 standard contribute to improved operational reliability and safety, aligning with the ongoing commitment to safeguarding personnel and maintaining safe working conditions.

This case study demonstrates the practical applications and benefits of the revised IEEE 1584 standard, emphasizing the need for continuous updates and adherence to the latest safety protocols in electrical engineering practices.

What has been your experience with calculations using IEEE 1584 2018 versus IEEE 1584 2002?

Contact us today at PowerSafe Engineering!

#ArcFlashAnalysis

#IEEE1584

#ElectricalSafety

#ShortCircuitAnalysis

#PowerSystemAnalysis

#ElectricalEngineering

#IncidentEnergy

#WorkplaceSafety

#EngineeringCaseStudy

#EnergyCalculations